The Office for National Statistics
(ONS) has started a consultation,
which runs until 30 November 2012, on changes to the calculation of the Retail
Prices Index (RPI).
The
changes being considered to the RPI’s formula are likely to make the RPI move
more slowly in line with the Consumer
Prices Index (CPI) and close the gap between the two indices.
One of the
CPI’s key differences from the RPI is that it doesn’t reflect the cost of
buying and owning a home.
There's
already been much comment on the detrimental effect a change to RPI might have
for example on pensioners’ incomes – see this report from the BBC.
It might
also affect the value of some property investments.
RPI is
sometimes used as the basis for reviewing rent under a commercial lease as an
alternative to fixed or open market rent reviews.
When
adopting index-based rent reviews, landlords have tended to prefer RPI to CPI because
it rises at a faster rate than CPI.
If the
method of calculating RPI slows its rate of increase, this will obviously slow the
rate of increase of rents which are reviewed on that basis too.
This shows
the dangers for landlords inherent in opting for index-linked reviews,
especially in long leases.
The index
can be manipulated for reasons that are remote from questions of property
valuation – political ones for example.
It’s hard
to draft around this in ways that will be effective over a long period.
And more
generally, although indexation may be a convenient way of trying to preserve
the purchasing power of the rent a landlord receives, it doesn't reflect the trend
in rental values – which is, arguably, what a rent review clause is really
meant to do.
Photo by Thomas Claveirole via flickr
Photo by Thomas Claveirole via flickr
I agree with your general sentiments but an index linked review would be preferred by most landlords in the current market
ReplyDeleteI'm sure most landlords would be glad of any type of upwards only review at the moment given the average length of a lease term in 2011 was below 5 years!
ReplyDelete