“I wandered through each chartered street,
Near where the chartered Thames does flow...”
Near where the chartered Thames does flow...”
One of the longest running property disputes of all time must surely have been the disputed ownership of the City of London’s charter streets.
Dating
from 1667, the dispute was only finally settled in 2009, with consequences that
are still relevant to developers in the City today.
The
network of streets, alleys and passages in the City dating back to before 1667
are known as “charter streets”.
Ownership
of the charter streets was, for 342 years, disputed between the Crown and the
City of London Corporation (CLC).
The
Crown’s claim was based on a charter granted in 1638 by Charles I (during his
doomed attempt at absolute monarchy), in which the Crown granted the CLC all
the buildings and encroachments on streets in the City, but reserved the
streets and other parts to the Crown.
The CLC,
for its part, claimed ownership of the streets under the Rebuilding of London
Act 1667, passed in the aftermath of the Fire of London in 1666 (which
destroyed 13,200 houses, 87 parish churches, St Paul’s Cathedral and most City
authority buildings).
The CLC
claimed the 1667 Act transferred title in all common streets and highways of
the City to the CLC.
It was a
claim that was never accepted by the Crown.
This was a
considerable thorn in the side of developers, as for over 300 years it meant
that if a proposed development affected a charter street, they had to negotiate
with both the Crown and the CLC – causing considerable delay and expense
(although in more recent times the CLC would negotiate on behalf of the Crown
and split the proceeds of any deal struck with developers between the CLC and
the Crown in a way that wasn't usually disclosed to the developers themselves).
The
centuries old dispute was eventually settled, not by incontrovertible legal
argument, but instead by the more straightforward device of the Crown selling
its interest in the charter streets to the CLC in 2009.
Are
charter streets still relevant?
Yes - the
CLC still owns the charter streets.
Developers
must still identify whether a charter street is affected by a proposed
development and negotiate terms with the CLC (in its capacity as private owner
of the street) if they want to acquire part of it or for new buildings to encroach on, overhang or undershoot a
charter street – but at least, thanks to the 2009 sale, they no longer have to
negotiate with the Crown as well.
Identifying
charter streets however has not always been an easy task.
To be a
charter street, it must have existed in 1638 and have been situated within the
boundaries of the City at that time.
There’s no
public map identifying the charter streets which will determine whether or not
the developer needs to negotiate with the CLC.
For many years before the
Crown sold its interest, the way the charter streets were managed was positively Kafkaesque.
The only record of the streets was a plan deposited by the Crown at the Land Registry which was used by the Land Registry to notify the Crown’s lawyers whenever an application was received relating to those streets.
The only record of the streets was a plan deposited by the Crown at the Land Registry which was used by the Land Registry to notify the Crown’s lawyers whenever an application was received relating to those streets.
No one else had a copy of the plan, so developers’ lawyers would only start to hear of a
problem when they applied to register a dealing and were then met with an
objection from the Crown.
Things eventually
became more open when the Crown started lodging cautions against first
registration against each charter street, which would show up on an index map
search and alert developers’ lawyers to their existence at the outset.
Lawyers
must still search the index map to find out whether there is a caution against
first registration or whether the streets have been transferred into the CLC’s
name.
The CLC website is
silent on the subject of charter streets altogether.
The terms
of any permission offered by the CLC may vary from transaction to transaction,
and will involve negotiating the price and duration of the arrangement and any
covenants to be imposed.
Developers
will of course also need to deal with the CLC in its capacity as public
authority in relation to matters such as planning and construction, and may
also need to consider stopping-up orders (terminating public rights of way) and
the release of any private rights of way.
..............................................................................
I wandered through each chartered street,
Near where the chartered Thames does flow,
A mark in every face I meet,
Marks of weakness, marks of woe.
In every cry of every man,
In every infant's cry of fear,
In every voice, in every ban,
The mind-forged manacles I hear:
How the chimney-sweeper's cry
Every blackening church appals,
And the hapless soldier's sigh
Runs in blood down palace-walls.
But most, through midnight streets I hear
How the youthful harlot's curse
Blasts the new-born infant's tear,
And blights with plagues the marriage-hearse.
Near where the chartered Thames does flow,
A mark in every face I meet,
Marks of weakness, marks of woe.
In every cry of every man,
In every infant's cry of fear,
In every voice, in every ban,
The mind-forged manacles I hear:
How the chimney-sweeper's cry
Every blackening church appals,
And the hapless soldier's sigh
Runs in blood down palace-walls.
But most, through midnight streets I hear
How the youthful harlot's curse
Blasts the new-born infant's tear,
And blights with plagues the marriage-hearse.
"London" by
William Blake (1757-1827)
Photo by Chalkstream via flickr
No comments:
Post a Comment