The
short-term letting of holiday accommodation through internet sites such as
Airbnb has grown exponentially in recent years.
Many have
been encouraged to engage in the “sharing economy” by making their homes, or a
spare room, available for holiday lets.
It's now become a hot topic for property lawyers, as short-term letting
has recently come before the courts in the context of landlord and tenant law.
Although the
case was not specifically concerned with Airbnb, it has prompted many in the
legal world to take a closer look at the potential legal pitfalls for
homeowners in letting out their homes in this way, in particular leaseholders.
As this
applies to most flat owners, it will be of particular concern to those with
accommodation in popular city centre locations.
And there
are other issues for freeholders and leaseholders to think about too.
Airbnb’s terms and conditions say hosts must not “violate any local, state, provincial, national, or other law or regulation, or any order of a court, including, without limitation, zoning restrictions and Tax regulations”.
So although this blog normally only looks at commercial property law, I thought I'd take the opportunity to collate some of the main issues that have been flagged by commentators on airbnb style lettings following the recent case.
Airbnb’s terms and conditions say hosts must not “violate any local, state, provincial, national, or other law or regulation, or any order of a court, including, without limitation, zoning restrictions and Tax regulations”.
It’s up to the
host to know what rules and regulations might apply in their country and
region.
So although this blog normally only looks at commercial property law, I thought I'd take the opportunity to collate some of the main issues that have been flagged by commentators on airbnb style lettings following the recent case.
Leaseholders - Check your lease
You must
check the terms of your lease to ensure it doesn’t contain provisions that
prohibit short term sub-letting or use as a holiday let.
That doesn’t
only mean looking at the underletting or “alienation” clauses, as seen in the
recent case before the Upper Tribunal, Nemcova
v Fairfield Rents Limited [2016] UKUT 303 (LC).
The Upper
Tribunal ruled that a tenant (who held a 99 year lease) had breached a covenant
in her lease not to use her flat other than as a private residence by granting
a series of short-term lettings.
She had advertised the flat on
the internet and let it to business travellers and holiday makers on a series
of occasional short term lets.
There was no
restriction on subletting in the lease (other than in the last 7 years of the
term). What was decisive in this case was the duration of the periods of
occupation by the successive occupiers, which was considered a breach of the
user covenant.
In letting
her flat on short term lets, it meant that the tenant’s own occupation of her
flat was so transient and not sufficiently permanent that she would not
consider the property her private residence.
In order for
a property to be used as a private residence, there must be a degree of
permanence going beyond being there for a weekend or a few nights in the week.
The occupation of the flat by
each of the short term subtenants lacked sufficient permanency for it to be
considered occupation of the flat “as a private residence” by them, so unless
the Court of Appeal deals with this issue in future and reaches a different
conclusion, we now have judicial authority that such a covenant is breached by
short term or Airbnb style letting.
Arguably a
longer term of subletting would have complied, but the Tribunal did not
stipulate what minimum period would be required.
Each case
will be fact specific. In this case, the tenant had been letting out the flat
for collectively long periods of about 90 days a year. That is clearly not the
same as someone who, for example, decides to let their home out for two weeks a
year while they themselves are on holiday, which I assume would not have fallen
foul of the use covenant in this case, although there’s no authority for this.
All the
terms of the lease should be checked carefully, not just the obvious ones such
as whether there are there any restrictions of sub-letting, or whether the
landlord’s consent is required.
Has the
landlord made any regulations that the lease says need to be complied with? If
so, check they don’t prohibit or control short term lets.
Most leases
will also prohibit noise nuisance. Noisy holidaying guests might put you at
risk of a claim either from the landlord or other tenants in the building.
Freeholders – Check for Covenants
Check your deeds to make sure that there are no
historic covenants that might prevent short lets.
Freeholders and leaseholders
There are
other things to think about too, whether your home is leasehold or freehold.
Is your home mortgaged?
You need to ensure that granting holiday lets doesn’t breach the terms
of your mortgage.
Mortgage terms will usually insist that the lender’s prior written
consent must be obtained to any lettings, and the interest rates you agreed
might only apply for as long as you occupy the property as your only or main residence.
Failure to comply could lead to a demand for repayment in full or repossession
of the property.
If the lender decides to give consent, it might demand a higher rate of
interest in return.
Insurance
You must check your insurance to
make sure it won’t be invalidated by letting out your home as a holiday let.
In leasehold flats it’s usually the freeholders’ obligation to take out
insurance to cover the entire building, and the leaseholder will usually have
its own contents insurance, so both policies should be checked.
A mortgage is also likely to require adequate insurance to be in place
at all times.
Airbnb states on its website that it offers Host Guarantee and Host
Protection Insurance, but it adds that “this does not take the place of homeowners
or renters insurance or of adequate liability coverage.”
"Adequate liability coverage" should include public liability insurance. If a guest
is injured or if their property is damaged while they are staying in your home,
you may be held liable. Public liability insurance is designed to cover risks
such as these.
Planning Law
– London
In London, the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1973 provides
that local authorities can serve enforcement notices on a property owner who
has breached planning law by changing the use without planning permission.
Failure to comply with an enforcement notice can result in a £20,000 fine.
Until last year this was considered to be effectively a ban on all
holiday letting without specific planning permission.
Section 44 of the Deregulation
Act 2015 amended the 1973 Act to allow short term letting for up to 90 days
each year, as long as the host is liable for council tax.
However, local authorities may
direct that the “90-day rule” exemption doesn’t apply to certain residential
premises, or residential premises in certain areas.
Before letting your London
property as a holiday let, you should check with your local authority first to
see whether the exemption applies.
Planning – Nationwide
There may also be a planning
issue for properties outside London, depending on the intensity of use.
A private
residence is a Class C3 use (dwelling houses). There’s a risk that a local
authority might challenge the use of your property for short-term lets on the
basis that that is a C1 (hotels) use, not C3, or that a material change of use
to a sui generis use has taken place.
If your
property is leasehold, your lease is likely to include a covenant to comply
with planning law, or may even specify C3 use, and in either case you risk
being in breach.
Health and Safety
You will be obliged to comply with health and safety laws, such as fire
safety and the installation of smoke alarms.
Taxation
You will need to pay any taxes
that are payable on the income you receive.
It might be buried in the detailed terms and conditions of holiday let websites, but homeowners are not being adequately warned about the need to
check on compliance with lease terms, mortgage terms, insurance and planning by
the websites themselves, and so it’s incumbent on homeowners themselves to make
sure they are fully aware.
Now landlords are learning more about the workings of the sharing
economy, perhaps we can expect to see clauses creeping into residential leases
that will seek to control, or even specifically prohibit, this type of short
term letting.
No comments:
Post a Comment