The
government issued guidance
on 26 March 2020 for people involved in buying or selling homes during the
COVID-19 stay-at-home period.
This blog usually
only deals with commercial property, but I thought it might be helpful to include
something on house buying and selling too.
The government
guidance has separate elements aimed at estate agents, conveyancers, surveyors
and removal firms.
The general
advice is to urge parties involved in home moving to adapt and be flexible to
alter their usual processes.
Where
contracts have already been exchanged but not completed
The guidance
states:
“There is
no need to pull out of transactions, but we all need to ensure we are following
guidance to stay at home and away from others at all times, including the
specific measures for those who are presenting symptoms, self-isolating or
shielding. Prioritising the health of individuals and the public must be the
priority.”
This may
mean it’s simply not possible to move home.
Where the
property being moved into is vacant, then the advice says you can continue with
the transaction although you should follow the guidance note on home removals.
Where the
property is currently occupied, the government encourages all parties to do all
they can to amicably agree alternative dates to move, for a time when it is
likely that stay-at-home measures against COVID-19 will no longer be in place.
In practice,
that could be for a long time.
Under its
heading “Advice to the Public” the government states:
·
“Home
buyers and renters should, where possible, delay moving to a new house while
measures are in place to fight coronavirus (COVID-19).
·
Our
advice is that if you have already exchanged contracts and the property is
currently occupied then all parties should work together to agree a delay or
another way to resolve this matter.
·
If
moving is unavoidable for contractual reasons and the parties are unable to
reach an agreement to delay, people must follow advice on staying away from
others to minimise the spread of the virus.
·
In
line with Government’s advice, anyone with symptoms, self-isolating or
shielding from the virus, should follow medical advice which will mean not
moving house for the time being, if at all possible. All parties should
prioritise agreeing amicable arrangements to change move dates for individuals
in this group, or where someone in a chain is in this group.”
The
government advises agents to work with their clients to broker a new date to
move where sales are due to complete on occupied properties; and conveyancers to make every effort to support clients who are
due to complete on occupied properties in the stay-at-home period to change
this date.
The
government guidance also states that conveyancers should prioritise supporting
anyone with symptoms, self-isolating or shielding from the virus and those they
are in chain with, and the government urges them to do all they can to help a
new date to be agreed in these circumstances.
The legal consequences
of delayed or abandoned completion are not contemplated by the government guidance,
which as we have seen focusses more on trying to resolve things amicably.
Standard
conveyancing contracts do not contain force majeure clauses.
The Standard
Conditions of Sale (Fifth Edition – 2018 revision), used in most residential transactions,
contain provisions dealing with delayed completion, remedies and compensation.
I won’t go into all those terms here, but they were clearly designed to deal
with defaulting buyers or sellers, rather than the current situation.
Under
Standard Condition 6.8, a notice to complete may be served when the completion
date specified in the contract has passed and completion has not taken place.
The notice requires the parties to complete within 10 working days of the
notice, excluding the day on which the notice is given.
However, a
notice to complete may only be served by a party who is “ready, able and willing
to complete”. If it’s impossible for completion to take place whilst
complying with the lockdown, then that might also prevent a contractual party from
serving a valid notice to complete or render a notice invalid following its
service. Each case will depend on its own facts.
If a notice
to complete is served, then that makes time of the essence. That could
potentially make serving the notice counter-productive if the person receiving
the notice is then able to argue that completion by that date has become
impossible.
Once a
strict time limit has been imposed, the recipient of the notice to complete
might be able to argue that the contract has been frustrated if completion
is impossible, although how successful they would be in making such an argument
is hard to predict as the law currently stands.
Will some
contracts be frustrated anyway?
That's also hard to predict.
That's also hard to predict.
As we have
seen in the context of commercial
leases, frustration is not an easy case to prove, and the government guidance
places an onus on all parties to do all they can to agree alternative
arrangements, which is likely to be taken into account.
There don’t
appear to have been any cases in English law considering frustration by a
pandemic, not even during the so-called Spanish Influenza of 1918/19.
Inevitably there
will be commercial disputes arising out of COVID-19 that will include arguments
on frustration. Whether there will also be disputes concerning residential
sales where frustration is argued remains to be seen.
Some might
try and argue that their contract has been discharged by supervening
illegality.
A contract
is discharged if its performance becomes illegal by English law. However, for
the doctrine to take effect, the illegality must prohibit performance. Hindering
performance or making it more inconvenient is not good enough, and so that
could make this a difficult argument to run in the context of house sales,
especially as the parties have been encouraged by government guidance to agree
alternative arrangements.
Anyone
involved in such transactions would surely be better served by following the general
advice to adapt and be flexible, rather than resorting to litigation in novel
circumstances. That being said, it takes two to tango.
Where
matters are litigated, a party’s conduct, judged in the light of the government
guidance, will surely be an important factor to be taken into consideration by
the courts.
UK Finance
has confirmed that lenders are working on ways to support would-be borrowers
that have exchanged contracts. This includes looking at extending mortgage
offers for up to three months to enable the move to take place at a later date.
Police
Powers
The guidance
refers to the new emergency enforcement powers that the police have been given
to respond to coronavirus, and states “there is an exemption for critical
home moves, in the event that a new date is unable to be agreed”.
I’ve taken a
closer look at these new powers.
The emergency
powers are contained in Statutory
Instrument 2020 No. 350 The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions)
(England) Regulations 2020, made on 26 March 2020 under the Public Health
(Control of Disease) Act 1984, and are in force until further notice.
The phrase “critical
home moves”, that is used in the guidance, is not used in the
Regulations themselves, which instead refer to moving where “reasonably
necessary”, which seems to set a lower bar.
The
following regulations are directly relevant to house moves.
·
Regulation
6 (1) states that during the emergency period, no person may leave the place
where they are living without a reasonable excuse. Regulation 6 (2) sets out a
non-exhaustive list of reasonable excuses which includes the need “to move
house where reasonably necessary” (Regulation 6 (2) (l)).
·
Regulation
7 states that during the emergency period, no person may participate in a
gathering in a public place of more than two people, and lists a series of
exceptions, which include “where reasonably necessary…to facilitate a house
move” (Regulation 7 (d) (i)).
The Regulations
must be reviewed by the Secretary of State at least once every 21 days, with
the first review being carried out by 16 April 2020 (Regulation 3(2)). The
Regulations otherwise expire 6 months after coming into force.
Anyone who
contravenes a requirement in the relevant Regulations without reasonable excuse
commits an offence punishable by a fine.
In most
cases these fines will be imposed by fixed term penalty notices, and the fine
is £30 if paid within 14 days, increasing to £60 if not paid within that period.
This doubles for every subsequent fixed penalty notice to a maximum of £960
(Regulation 10). The CPS also has powers to bring prosecutions under the
Regulations (Regulation 11). Prosecutions could lead to a person having a
criminal record.
Entering
into new contracts
Where
contracts have not yet been entered into, if the property is unoccupied then
the guidance states that you can continue with the transaction.
This isn’t
mentioned in the guidance, but thought will still need to be given to practicalities
such as to the execution of documents; ensuring monies are paid on time;
handing over keys; and securing the property if it is to remain unoccupied.
With occupied
properties, the guidance states that all parties should work together either to
delay exchanging contracts until after the stay-at-home measures have been
ended, or to include explicit contractual provisions to take account of the
risks presented by the virus.
Draft contractual
provisions are now being circulated within the legal profession for use in such
cases.
The
standardised residential conveyancing contracts widely in use, without the
addition of new specific provisions dealing with the current situation, are no
longer adequate.
Viewing
and inspecting properties
Physical
viewings of properties should not take place.
The guidance
states that surveyors should not expect to carry out non-urgent surveys in
homes where people are in residence, and no inspections should take place if
any person in the property is showing symptoms, self-isolating or being
shielded.
Preparatory
work that can be undertaken remotely can proceed, but inspections to take
internal photographs or produce an energy performance certificate should not be
undertaken, which in practice may mean a property cannot be put on the market.
There are
other recommendations in the guidance for surveyors and removal firms.
No comments:
Post a Comment